- From: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:14:56 -0500
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 16:15:48 UTC
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > On Feb 22, 2012 2:02 AM, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org> wrote: > > > > * Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> [2012-02-21 22:26+0100] > > > At the usual place: > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.02.22 > > > > > > Speak to you tomorrow. > > > > regrets for tomorrow (jury duty) > > > > persuant to ACTION-147: "Propose by next week text that replaces section > 4.3", I propose to replace > > < > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-strings > > > > with > > < > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-escapes > > > > (and clean up the miscellaneous references to #sec-escapes after > approval). > > I need to slightly correct the proposal: the example of %-escaping has a > \'d "-" in an IRI. I'll strike that when I no longer need to sit in > judgement of my fellow man (jury duty). > FWIW, this IRI example appears in the section on blank node labels and pname local names (and the PERCENT terminal applies to blank nodes/local names). Perhaps the IRI should be changed to a pname for this example? -Alex > > Guus > > > > > > > -- > > -ericP >
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 16:15:48 UTC