Re: Three solution designs to the first three Graphs use cases

On 2/8/12 8:59 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:23 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 2/1/12 11:16 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> I'm not opposed to quads or SPARQL at all; I'm just trying to understand
>>> what's reasonable to add (or even change *shudder*) to provide solutions
>>> for the use cases.
>>>
>>>       -- Sandro
>> I truly believe, use cases will come from field use across industry.
>> When this happens en masse, and the limitations of existing specs and
>> implementations a prohibitively taxed, there will be an obvious
>> trigger for RDF v.Next. Until then, tinkering with what's in the midst
>> of a prolonged and protracted bootstrap will always meet coherent and
>> pragmatic resistance :-)
> I think I agree, but how can a Next Version happen under the pressure of
> everyone needing it Right Now?
>
>     -- Sandro

"Now" is complicated, but it rarely (in the context of technology) means 
"Right Now" .

Via my personal context lenses, I see "Now" as being somewhere in the 5 
yr range from now :-)

Kingsley


>
>> -- 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen 
>> Founder&  CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen