(A PRIORITY) Exchanging the contents of RDF stores

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC#.28A_PRIORITY.29_Exchanging_the_contents_of_RDF_stores

One of our prioritised UC is "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores".

I'd like to prose that TriG, without additional semantic or annotation 
assumptions, meets this UC.  The WG should resolve to cover this usage 
pattern.

This codifies the situation where no annotations of the graph tagging 
relationship exists.

It implies that quads are not an internal implementation matter but a 
way systems can exchange data.

 Andy

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 14:30:56 UTC