- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:58:13 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Richard's first comment included: > I think that this discussion belongs onto the WG mailing list and > shouldn't just be buried in the issue tracker, so I'm posting the > message here too. Ditto. I received offlist email: On 30/08/12 18:32, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > I've created a timestamped editor's draft for the syntax and the > API spec at > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/json-ld/raw-file/default/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120830/index.html > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/json-ld/raw-file/default/spec/ED/json-ld-api/20120830/index.html > > @cygri <https://github.com/cygri>, @afs <https://github.com/afs> does > this address all the concerns you raised as part of this issue so > that I can close it? > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/47#issuecomment-8167501>. > What are the changes within these two document that are relevant to this discussion? (And why does it now span two documents?) I'm not sure what you're asking me about - checking two large docs isn't viable. I do see (ISSUE 47 note): """ Note that this definition is provisional, and may be reverted to something closer to the original depending on community feedback. """ so nothing has actually been decided yet? [[ Note JSON-LD allows properties to be BNodes, while RDF does not. When used as just JSON-LD, this is not unreasonable; it only becomes an issue (and could raise an exception) when transformed to RDF. ]] but also: [[ An edge must be labeled with an absolute IRI, within the JSON-LD syntax, this label is called a property. ]] I like the note spelling out that linked data does not have to be JSON-LD. Are notes going to be in the final document? Andy
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2012 17:58:42 UTC