W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: shared bnodes (Re: RDF dataset semantics again)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:34:14 +0100
Message-ID: <503DFE36.4020607@epimorphics.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: public-rdf-wg@w3.org

On 29/08/12 11:33, Steve Harris wrote:
>> So shared bNodes matter in Jena.  The TriG parser scopes bNode
>> labels to the document (although it is policy driven and the other
>> policies exist but are not exposed in the API).
> OK, interesting, and that's not caused any issues for people?

No reports of problems but they may be because people rarely exchange 
data via TriG files and don't make them with text processing.

> The only way you can import shared bNodes into (and export from)
> 4store is using Skolem URIs. I know some people have used those, but
> I don't have any idea of how many.

Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 11:34:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:20 UTC