W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: JSON-LD terminology

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:52:32 -0400
Message-ID: <503BC1F0.1010100@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 8/27/12 1:25 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> Yes, we could add something that prohibits a key in a JSON-LD object from having the form of a BNode; I don't think this would really loose anything. The grammar in A.1 should say:
> [[[
> Keys are IRIs, compact IRIs, terms defined within the active context which MUST evaluate to absolute IRIs, or one of the following keywords
> ]]]
> or words to that effect.
> I would support removing that note, but I think the original came as a result of lobbying by Kingsley

Of what to you speak? Give me a link so I can put your comment in 
context that's easy for me to understand etc.

Whenever I use the word "Key" its in the context of a DBMS key, and 
typically when analogizing the effects of a Linked Data style of 
de-referencable URI.



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Monday, 27 August 2012 18:52:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:20 UTC