Re: RDF dataset semantics again

On Aug 21, 2012, at 21:48 , Pat Hayes wrote:
[snip]
>> 
>> 
>> Antoine, I have the impression that we are actually in agreement. The document we have put forward has two essential points:
>> 
>> - we would have a default semantics in the form of the quoting semantics
> 
> 
> Whoa. I do not know what y'all mean by a "default semantics". Is this a default that can be overridden? If so, I know of NO semantic theory  anywhere in logic or linguistics that can provide this. If y'all want this, you are on your own. 
> 
> If not, what exactly is it supposed to mean? 
> 
> Pat


What I meant is: this is the semantics that is standardized to be valid in the absence of any other indication. I did not say anything else.

Ivan


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 07:05:27 UTC