- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:04:46 +0200
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Aug 21, 2012, at 21:48 , Pat Hayes wrote: [snip] >> >> >> Antoine, I have the impression that we are actually in agreement. The document we have put forward has two essential points: >> >> - we would have a default semantics in the form of the quoting semantics > > > Whoa. I do not know what y'all mean by a "default semantics". Is this a default that can be overridden? If so, I know of NO semantic theory anywhere in logic or linguistics that can provide this. If y'all want this, you are on your own. > > If not, what exactly is it supposed to mean? > > Pat What I meant is: this is the semantics that is standardized to be valid in the absence of any other indication. I did not say anything else. Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 07:05:27 UTC