- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:26:46 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'W3C RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote: > +1. Yes, let's be okay with the term "graph" (even RDF Graph) > being fuzzy . And yes, we should probably have terminology for > use when we don't want to be fuzzy, like "abstract graph". +1 - I like where this discussion is going. -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 16:27:22 UTC