- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:04:16 +0200
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Le 20/08/2012 17:14, Sandro Hawke a écrit : > [cut] > > We'd just be separating the RDF semantics from the RDF model and syntax. > It would now be okay, according to the spec, to use the RDF model and > syntax without using the RDF semantics. What does this change to the current situation? RDF semantics is separated from the RDF model & syntax (except that the word "concepts" is used instead of "model") and it is Ok to implement one without the other and this is what people actually do. Not every applications that use RDF have to be reasoners (RDF parsers, W3C RDF validator, RDF editors, some triplestores, linked data browser, etc). Moreover, the current RDF 1.1 Concepts explains much better than RDF 1.0 Concept what the concepts are supposed to mean. So I expect that, with the new specs, it will be even easier to implement the model without bothering about the formal semantics. -AZ > > [cut] > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 16:04:40 UTC