- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:57:17 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <502E4DBD.2000002@openlinksw.com>
On 8/17/12 9:52 AM, David Wood wrote: > On Aug 17, 2012, at 09:09, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: >> With apologies for breaching the worm-can. > Yeah, I was really hoping we could make some progress without getting lost in naming. It is not our most important problem. Besides, polymorphic naming is everywhere in our language not just in computer science. I am not swayed by objections to it. > > So, I don't particularly care about the term space and won't fight over it. "source" works for me, and I would accept the others. > > Regards, > Dave You have RDF data sources (datasets or triple collections) associated with RDF data source names (which can take the form of an IRI). How about that? Kingsley > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 13:55:42 UTC