- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:01:24 +0200
- To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> Backward compatibility requirement: yes, I agree. > > I am less confident about the second. Publishing a rec but having a > next version already as an official draft does not seem to be the right > message to be sent out. Personally, I would prefer to wait for more > extensive usage and implementation experiences to be gathered with a > stable spec. Well, the signal I want to send out is that there is a *small* set of features that should be available *soon* in contrast to what usually happens: at *some point in the future* there might be a *big* change (even if it is backwards compatible). -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 10:01:57 UTC