Wednesday, 30 November 2011
- Minutes 2011-11-30
- Re: working through some details on "Just Works" escapes
- Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Nov telecon
- working through some details on "Just Works" escapes
- Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Nov telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Nov telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Nov telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 30 Nov telecon
Tuesday, 29 November 2011
Monday, 28 November 2011
Friday, 25 November 2011
- Re: Character escapes in prefix names
- Re: Character escapes in prefix names
- Re: Character escapes in prefix names
- Character escapes in prefix names
Thursday, 24 November 2011
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Call for applications: WWW2012 Metadata Challenge
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: The value space of XMLLiteral (was: Re: XML literals poll)
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: The value space of XMLLiteral (was: Re: XML literals poll)
- Re: The value space of XMLLiteral (was: Re: XML literals poll)
- Re: The value space of XMLLiteral (was: Re: XML literals poll)
- Re: Value-based comparison and GML
- Re: The value space of XMLLiteral (was: Re: XML literals poll)
Wednesday, 23 November 2011
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Value-based comparison and GML (was: Re: XML literals poll)
- The value space of XMLLiteral (was: Re: XML literals poll)
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Fwd: XML Literals poll
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: Add-on to the XML Literal discussion
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: Add-on to the XML Literal discussion
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: Add-on to the XML Literal discussion
- Re: Add-on to the XML Literal discussion
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Add-on to the XML Literal discussion
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
Tuesday, 22 November 2011
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: unicode escapes in prefix names
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Aligning Turtle and SPARQL escape sequence processing.
- Re: reminder: no telecon tomorrow
- Closure of ISSUE-113, based on your Last Call comments
- reminder: no telecon tomorrow
Monday, 21 November 2011
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: Re 2: XML literals poll
- Re: Re 2: XML literals poll
- Re 2: XML literals poll
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: XML literals poll
- Re: XML literals poll
- XML literals poll
Sunday, 20 November 2011
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Moving discussion of XSD types from RDF Semantics to RDF Concepts
- Re: A new introduction section for RDF Concepts
Friday, 18 November 2011
- Re: A new introduction section for RDF Concepts
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: ISSUE-13: a proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: Moving discussion of XSD types from RDF Semantics to RDF Concepts
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
Thursday, 17 November 2011
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
Thursday, 17 November 2011
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: Wording tweaks in Fragment Identifier section
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: Wording tweaks in Fragment Identifier section
- Re: ISSUE-13: a proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Wording tweaks in Fragment Identifier section
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
- Wording tweaks in Fragment Identifier section
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: What fourth column should be
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: What fourth column should be
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: ISSUE-13: a proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: a proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: What fourth column should be
- Re: ISSUE-13: a proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: a proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: What fourth column should be
- Re: What fourth column should be
- ISSUE-13: a proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral
- minutes for today's meeting
- What fourth column should be
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- Re: [ALL] agenda 16 Nov telecon 1100 EST
Tuesday, 15 November 2011
- [ALL] agenda 16 Nov telecon 1100 EST
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Turtle in HTML question/issue
- agenda
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
Monday, 14 November 2011
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
Sunday, 13 November 2011
Saturday, 12 November 2011
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: A new introduction section for RDF Concepts
- Re: A new introduction section for RDF Concepts
Friday, 11 November 2011
- A new introduction section for RDF Concepts
- Re: contexts, graph names and so on
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: contexts, graph names and so on
- Re: Leaving the WG
- Leaving the WG
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
Thursday, 10 November 2011
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: Close ISSUE-76?
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: contexts, graph names and so on
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]
- Re: ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- ISSUE-13: History of rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: contexts, graph names and so on
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Proposal: Strike section “Fragment Identifiers” from RDF Concepts
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Moving discussion of XSD types from RDF Semantics to RDF Concepts
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
- Re: Proposal: Strike section “Fragment Identifiers” from RDF Concepts
- Proposal: Strike section “Fragment Identifiers” from RDF Concepts
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- RDF-ISSUE-79 (undefined-datatype): What is the value of a literal whose datatype IRI is not a datatype? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Typed literals gone from RDF Concepts; hello language-tagged strings
- Re: contexts, graph names and so on
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- RDF Working Group Teleconference Minutes of 09 November 2011
- Re: [ALL] Telecon Agenda 9 Nov 2011
- Regrets
- Re: [ALL] Telecon Agenda 9 Nov 2011
- Scribe for Today?
- Re: [ALL] Telecon Agenda 9 Nov 2011
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
- Re: graph names as third argument
- Re: graph names as third argument
- Re: graph names as third argument
- Re: graph names as third argument
- Re: graph names as third argument
- Re: [ALL] Telecon Agenda 9 Nov 2011
- Re: graph names as third argument
Monday, 7 November 2011
- [ALL] Telecon Agenda 9 Nov 2011
- Re: Status update on LC comments and post-LC changes to R2RML
- Status update on LC comments and post-LC changes to R2RML
Thursday, 3 November 2011
- Re: contexts, graph names and so on
- Re: graph names as third argument
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
Wednesday, 2 November 2011
- Re: graph names as third argument
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- graph names as third argument
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: contexts, graph names and so on
- Re: Able to Edit RDF/XML?
- contexts, graph names and so on
- Minutes from RDF-WG 11.2.2011 Posted
- Re: Able to Edit RDF/XML?
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: [ALL] agenda 2 Nov telecon (Europeans: one hour earlier!)
- Re: Blank Node Ordering
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Re: URI aliases for RDF terms?
- URI aliases for RDF terms?
- Regrets for today's telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 2 Nov telecon (Europeans: one hour earlier!)
- Re: [ALL] agenda 2 Nov telecon (Europeans: one hour earlier!)