- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:22:52 -0500
- To: Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Gavin Carothers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Andy Seaborne > <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 27/06/11 19:55, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>> >>> This is the use case that TopQuadrant has internally that prompted >>> discussion between me and Gavin leading to this thread on this mailing >>> list. >>> >>> A significant portion of our product source is in RDF. >>> We are migrating our version control system to GIT to reduce cost of >>> merging >>> This will not work for RDF in the form that we currently store it, >>> because simple changes result in completely different documents >>> We are now working on a version of my earlier paper with additional >>> steps to insure reasonable stability of blank node IDs. >>> >>> (In the terms of the paper the bnode ids will be based on a hashcode >>> generated from the first distinctive triple for that bnode). >> >> I'm curious - why not store skolemized data? The skolemization URI could >> record sufficient information related to when the bNode id was first >> created. It's then fully reversible in syntax terms (with a little parser >> processing "deskolemization") to make bNodes reconstructable. > > Is skolemization fully transitive? Once the parser has created the > blank node will another seralizer produce the same skolemized blank > node? That question is meaningless. What do you mean by 'the same ... blank node'? And what do you mean by a 'skolemized blank node', for that matter? (Once skolemized, it is no longer a blank node, right? Which is the whole point....) > I don't think the current proposals do that. How would that > happen? WIth the only interpretation that I can give your question, it could never happen. Unless maybe you "deskolemized" by keeping the original graph in a cache somewhere and delivering it unchanged when presented with the skolemized version. > Would all implementations keep track of the skolem id after > reconstituting the blank node? In which case aren't we just turning > blank nodes into syntactic sugar for a skolem iri? (No objection to > that btw, but it's a bit odd) > >> >> For me, this is the point of skolemization - finding a bNode again need not >> be just across the web; it can also be temporally across serialized data. > > I agree, this FELT like the point of skolemization, but I'm not sure > that skolemization actually provides this. I'm just not sure how the > skolemization process is supposed to provide a stable blank node label > without either solving graph isomorphism or implementing something > very much like the c14n proposal here. In other words I do think that > skolemization could be used rather then "modifying the graph" ... > mostly since skolemization modifies the graph. > > --Gavin > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 00:23:31 UTC