- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:45:47 -0400
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 6/11/2011 12:58 PM, David Wood wrote: > Hi Axel, et al, > > It was not my intention to criticise the SPARQL WG's process. I have no reason to believe that the SPARQL WG is not following correct process, nor that they are somehow not processing comments. Instead, I was reporting on a rumor that may impact the process of the RDF WG as it decides how to respond to string issues that impact both SPARQL and Turtle. For the record and to be 100% clear, there's no truth to this rumor. If anyone has any concerns over the SPARQL WG's handling of comments, please contact me or team-sparql-chairs@w3.org. thanks, Lee
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2011 19:46:14 UTC