- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:38:14 +0100
- To: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>
- Cc: antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 9 Jun 2011, at 16:17, Alex Hall wrote: > For those interested, I pulled all this together on a wiki page: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/XSD_Datatypes For completeness, I added those XSD 1.0 types that are explicitly noted as being excluded from RDF. Are there any new types in XSD 1.1 that are not listed in the table? > A couple of questions arise from this: > 1. Should RDF's XSD datatype map be expanded to include the new XSD 1.1 xsd:dateTimeStamp (referenced by OWL2)? +1. And perhaps the various forms of durations too. (xsd:duration not being included in RDF is awkward, as one comes across ISO-8601 durations reasonably often in non-RDF formats.) > 2. Should we reference the new XSD1.1 spec for RDF? +1. Are these XSD 1.1 questions an ISSUE in the tracker yet? Best, Richard
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 11:39:23 UTC