- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:35:19 -0700
- To: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>
- Cc: antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Jun 9, 2011, at 08:17 , Alex Hall wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr> wrote: > Le 09/06/2011 13:55, Richard Cyganiak a écrit : > > On 9 Jun 2011, at 11:11, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > Should we update D-entailment such that it necessary supports XSDs? > (my answer: yes) > > I don't think so. The 'D' in RDF D-entailment is a placeholder for any datatype map that an application wants to use. SPARQL defines the datatypes that must be present in that map for implementations of SPARQL D-entailment, but I don't think we want to force that on all RDF implementations. > > > Wouldn't that cause problems with OWL2, which doesn't support all XSD types (eg xsd:time I believe)? > > Hmm, interesting. So, strangely enough, the datatype maps for the OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics entailment regime are not extensions of the datatype maps of the D-entailment regime in SPARQL 1.1 (as it is written now). This disserves to be pointed out to the SPARQL WG. > > ...and the datatype maps for OWL2 and SPARQL are both different from the XSD datatype map defined in RDF. For those interested, I pulled all this together on a wiki page: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/XSD_Datatypes > > A couple of questions arise from this: > 1. Should RDF's XSD datatype map be expanded to include the new XSD 1.1 xsd:dateTimeStamp (referenced by OWL2)? > 2. Should we reference the new XSD1.1 spec for RDF? I think we should at least seriously consider both these options, to be in line with OWL (and also RIF, b.t.w., which refers to XSD1.1, too). Caveat: XSD 1.1 is not yet a Rec. The reason why we could not close the RIF and the OWL working groups is that both standards refer to a non-recommendataion draft only and, whenever XSD 1.1 is a Rec, we will have to reissue an edited recommendation with the proper references. On the other hand, hopefully this will not be an issue for RDF. Ivan > > -Alex > > > > Note, however, that D-entailment (in SPARQL terms) does not support all XSD types either. > > -- > Antoine Zimmermann > Researcher at: > Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information > Database Group > 7 Avenue Jean Capelle > 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex > France > Tel: +33(0)4 72 43 61 74 - Fax: +33(0)4 72 43 87 13 > Lecturer at: > Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon > 20 Avenue Albert Einstein > 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex > France > antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr > http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/ > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 15:32:46 UTC