- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:38:28 +0200
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Le 09/06/2011 13:55, Richard Cyganiak a écrit : > On 9 Jun 2011, at 11:11, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: >> Should we update D-entailment such that it necessary supports XSDs? >> (my answer: yes) > > Wouldn't that cause problems with OWL2, which doesn't support all XSD types (eg xsd:time I believe)? Hmm, interesting. So, strangely enough, the datatype maps for the OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics entailment regime are not extensions of the datatype maps of the D-entailment regime in SPARQL 1.1 (as it is written now). This disserves to be pointed out to the SPARQL WG. Note, however, that D-entailment (in SPARQL terms) does not support all XSD types either. -- Antoine Zimmermann Researcher at: Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information Database Group 7 Avenue Jean Capelle 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France Tel: +33(0)4 72 43 61 74 - Fax: +33(0)4 72 43 87 13 Lecturer at: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon 20 Avenue Albert Einstein 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 12:38:57 UTC