public-rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2011 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2011

• Re: C14N use case: version control Steve Harris
• Re: C14N use case: version control Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Steve Harris
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Steve Harris

Wednesday, 29 June 2011

• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes for June 209th Gavin Carothers
• Re: comments on RDF-Datasets-Proposal Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: other proposal for the graph task-force Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: comments on RDF-Datasets-Proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Steve Harris
• Re: C14N use case: version control Andy Seaborne
• Re: comments on RDF-Datasets-Proposal Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: comments on RDF-Datasets-Proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: agenda 29 June telecon David Wood
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• Re: C14N use case: version control Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 28 June 2011

• Re: C14N use case: version control Gavin Carothers
• Re: C14N use case: version control Andy Seaborne
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Andy Seaborne
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Steve Harris
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Steve Harris
• Re: agenda 29 June telecon Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: other proposal for the graph task-force Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: comments on RDF-Datasets-Proposal Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: agenda 29 June telecon Thomas Steiner
• Re: Need help! IRC log of last week's call (was: Re: RDF/SPARQL telecon on graph terminology) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Richard Cyganiak
• Need help! IRC log of last week's call (was: Re: RDF/SPARQL telecon on graph terminology) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: agenda 29 June telecon Richard Cyganiak
• agenda 29 June telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF/SPARQL telecon on graph terminology Guus Schreiber
• ACTION-60: Discuss Turtle doc schedule with ericP Guus Schreiber
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 27 June 2011

• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Steve Harris
• C14N use case: chains of trust Jeremy Carroll
• C14N use case: version control Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• Admin: minutes 22 Jun telecon Guus Schreiber

Friday, 24 June 2011

• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Steve Harris
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 23 June 2011

• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Gavin Carothers
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Ian Davis
• Need for a canonical byte stream for an RDF graph Gavin Carothers
• Re: Question about RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax: 7.6.1 Replacing Blank Nodes with IRIs David Wood

Wednesday, 22 June 2011

• ACTION-56 my review on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol Pierre-Antoine Champin
• other proposal for the graph task-force Pierre-Antoine Champin
• comments on RDF-Datasets-Proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

• Re: [ALL] agenda 22 June telecon - focus on GRAPHS Thomas Steiner
• Re: [ALL] agenda 22 June telecon - focus on GRAPHS Steve Harris
• Re: [ALL] agenda 22 June telecon - focus on GRAPHS Andy Seaborne
• [ALL] agenda 22 June telecon - focus on GRAPHS Guus Schreiber
• RDF/SPARQL telecon on graph terminology David Wood

Monday, 20 June 2011

• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Andy Seaborne
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Sandro Hawke
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Andy Seaborne
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Andy Seaborne

Sunday, 19 June 2011

• Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Lee Feigenbaum
• What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral? Richard Cyganiak

Friday, 17 June 2011

• Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology David Wood
• Re: List of WG documents on the wiki Ivan Herman
• Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Antoine Zimmermann

Wednesday, 15 June 2011

• RE: Minutes for the June 15th RDF-WG Meeting Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Minutes for the June 15th RDF-WG Meeting David Wood
• Re: Minutes for the June 15th RDF-WG Meeting Alex Hall
• Re: Minutes for the June 15th RDF-WG Meeting David Wood
• Re: Minutes for the June 15th RDF-WG Meeting Alex Hall
• Minutes for the June 15th RDF-WG Meeting Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals David Wood
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 June 2011 Steve Harris
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 June 2011 William Waites
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 June 2011 Ivan Herman
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 June 2011 Ian Davis

Tuesday, 14 June 2011

• Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology Pierre-Antoine Champin

Monday, 13 June 2011

• Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-66 (xsd-datatypes): Update XSD datatype map with new XSD 1.1 datatypes [RDF General] David Wood
• SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology David Wood
• [ALL] Agenda 15 June 2011 David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes David Wood
• [ALL] Minor Issues with Minutes from 2011-06-08 David Wood
• RDF-ISSUE-66 (xsd-datatypes): Update XSD datatype map with new XSD 1.1 datatypes [RDF General] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-65 (xsd-version): Update XSD 1.0 references to XSD 1.1 [RDF General] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 11 June 2011

• Re: SPARQL comments Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SPARQL comments David Wood
• Re: Two thoughts on Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: List of WG documents on the wiki Richard Cyganiak

Friday, 10 June 2011

• Re: SPARQL comments Axel Polleres

Saturday, 11 June 2011

• regrets Pat Hayes

Friday, 10 June 2011

• Re: List of WG documents on the wiki Gavin Carothers
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Alex Hall
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Steve Harris
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Steve Harris
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Dan Brickley
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Steve Harris
• Re: Two thoughts on Turtle Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Dan Brickley
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Pat Hayes
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Pat Hayes

Thursday, 9 June 2011

• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Alex Hall
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Alex Hall
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Ivan Herman
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Alex Hall
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes William Waites
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Richard Cyganiak
• SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Jan Wielemaker
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Dan Brickley
• Re: Two thoughts on Turtle Richard Cyganiak
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Jan Wielemaker
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Jan Wielemaker
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Sandro Hawke
• Re: ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 8 June 2011

• ISSUE-12 On languages and datatypes William Waites
• Re: long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata William Waites
• List of WG documents on the wiki Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-59 - RDF/XML completeness Antoine Zimmermann
• long-range datatyping and rdfa/microdata Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-59 - RDF/XML completeness Dan Brickley
• ISSUE-59 - RDF/XML completeness Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: SPARQL comments David Wood
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Pat Hayes
• Regrets for today's telecon Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Two thoughts on Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: Two thoughts on Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re:SPARQL comments Andy Seaborne
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Andy Seaborne
• regrets for 08-Jun-11 telcon Souripriya Das
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Matteo Brunati
• Re: Two thoughts on Turtle Steve Harris
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Steve Harris
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon David Wood

Tuesday, 7 June 2011

• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Ian Davis
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Andy Seaborne
• Two thoughts on Turtle Sandro Hawke
• [AL] agenda 8 Jun telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Guus Schreiber

Friday, 3 June 2011

• Re: Introduction: Ian Davis David Wood
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Introduction: Ian Davis Ian Davis
• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 2 June 2011

• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Richard Cyganiak
• ISSUE-56 possible new information pending ... Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Alex Hall
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Ivan Herman
• Re: Mercurial repository layout Ivan Herman
• Re: Mercurial repository layout Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Mercurial repository layout Ivan Herman
• RDF 1.1 Concepts editor's draft is online Richard Cyganiak
• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Pat Hayes
• Re: Mercurial repository layout Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Mercurial repository layout Ivan Herman
• Re: Mercurial repository layout Richard Cyganiak
• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Andy Seaborne
• Re: Mercurial repository layout Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 1 June 2011

• RDF WG Minutes from 2011-06-01 Alex Hall
• Mercurial repository layout Richard Cyganiak
• Re: keeping issue-12 simple Lee Feigenbaum
• keeping issue-12 simple Pat Hayes
• Re: Regrets Souripriya Das
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Pat Hayes
• Regrets Mischa Tuffield
• Re: regrets for tomorrow (today) William Waites
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Ivan Herman
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Pat Hayes
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Pat Hayes
• regrets for tomorrow Pat Hayes
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Pat Hayes

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2011 12:19:13 UTC