- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:59:23 +0000
- To: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
David Wood wrote: > On Feb 24, 2011, at 13:12, Pat Hayes wrote: > >> It is much simpler: it is just wanting the WG to acknowledge that "an RDF graph" can either be a mathematical set, or it can be some kind of document or data structure or file than can be transmitted over a computer network. But it can't be both. > > What is the difference between an "RDF graph" and a RESTful "resource"? What is the difference between an "RDF graph token" and a RESTful "representation"? REST maps a resource to a set of values over time, each single value has a 1:N relationship with representations, "RDF Graph" (the mathematical set, platonic abstraction, g-snap) equates to a single value, and "RDF Graph Token" equates to a representation of that single value. In other mails, Sandro's, g-box equates to a RESTful resource, something which maps to different values (g-snaps) over time, where g-snap is a snapshot of the state of the g-box. RDF doesn't currently cater for anything like a g-box, and both a value and a representation of that value are given the same name "RDF Graph", which I believe was Pats original point. Hopefully Pat will confirm if that understanding is correct. Best, Nathan
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 20:00:10 UTC