- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:48:37 -0500
- To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:49 -0500, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: > Unfortunately, this document is not self-contained. In particular, it > points to the SPARQL document. This makes it hard to be a starting > point for anything. What do you mean? I haven't studied the document in detail, but looking through it, especially for references to SPARQL nothing jumps out as a problem. I see lots of references to SPARQL, but they seem like good and appropriate ones, given then design goal which many people support of Turtle being a sub-language of SPARQL. Procedurally, it's fine for our Turtle spec to lean on the SPARQL 1.0 Recommendation as much as we want, I believe. -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 17:48:48 UTC