- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:50:45 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1F5DE864-E2AB-42D2-9798-A234E904D8F0@w3.org>
On Feb 27, 2011, at 17:34 , Manu Sporny wrote: > On 02/27/2011 03:34 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> sorry to be critical: would it be possible to re-write these examples >> in Turtle? > > That would be impossible because TURTLE doesn't support g-snaps, right? :P :-) > > I could re-write them in TRiG, would that help? Yes Ivan > Is there some other > abstract syntax that I could use to make statements about a graph snapshot? > > Just to clarify, in JSON-LD - the "@" specifies the subject. Every other > key-value pair at the same level of scope as the "@" specifies > predicate-object pairings for the subject. If there is no "@", a bnode > is assumed. > > If you see something like: > > "@": { ... } > > The subject is a g-snap. If you see something like: > > "@": { ... } > "dc:date": "2011-02-26T22:18Z" > > The "dc:date" property applies to the g-snap. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce > http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2011 16:49:31 UTC