- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:50:45 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1F5DE864-E2AB-42D2-9798-A234E904D8F0@w3.org>
On Feb 27, 2011, at 17:34 , Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 02/27/2011 03:34 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> sorry to be critical: would it be possible to re-write these examples
>> in Turtle?
>
> That would be impossible because TURTLE doesn't support g-snaps, right? :P
:-)
>
> I could re-write them in TRiG, would that help?
Yes
Ivan
> Is there some other
> abstract syntax that I could use to make statements about a graph snapshot?
>
> Just to clarify, in JSON-LD - the "@" specifies the subject. Every other
> key-value pair at the same level of scope as the "@" specifies
> predicate-object pairings for the subject. If there is no "@", a bnode
> is assumed.
>
> If you see something like:
>
> "@": { ... }
>
> The subject is a g-snap. If you see something like:
>
> "@": { ... }
> "dc:date": "2011-02-26T22:18Z"
>
> The "dc:date" property applies to the g-snap.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce
> http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/
>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2011 16:49:31 UTC