- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:59:39 -0500
- To: <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> Subject: [ALL} Agenda telecon 23 Feb 11am EST Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:36:25 -0600 [...] > 2. Task forces > > Today mainly review of inputs > > 2.1 Turtle > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Turtle > > 2.2 JSON > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON > > 2.3 Graphs > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs > > 2.4 Other [...] I can make fairly good guesses on how the Turtle and JSON TFs should proceed. However, I don't have any idea on how the Graph TF is going to proceed. Is there any neutral document that at least lays out the major possible ways to go? I also have some fears here, namely that we will end up with something similar to RDF reification. peter PS: Of course, given my past criticism of Turtle documents, I have some ideas of what I think needs to be done in the Turtle TF, which may not completely fit the WG consensus.
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 14:00:54 UTC