- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:54:46 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Le 20/12/2011 21:55, Steve Harris a écrit : > [skip] > > I think most(?) people agree that a URI should denote/name/something > a graph, or some other entity, but not both at the same time. The > problem is that people don't follow this rule in RDF now*, don't > follow it in quads as implemented now, and I don't think they will > follow it in the future. > > So, does that break RDF, or does it break their applications? > > If it just breaks people's applications, then we can write what we > would like to happen in the document, and people who do the Right > Thing™ will be fine, and people who don't will suffer in some way. > > If on the other hand it breaks RDF, it's probably already too late, > and we have a problem. > > - Steve > > * e.g. http://blog.iandavis.com/2010/11/04/is-303-really-necessary/ I haven't read the whole post but where do you see a URI which is used to denote two different things at the same time? How do you know it denotes 2 things simultaneously? > [snap] -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 83 36 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 08:54:53 UTC