- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:46:10 -0600
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Dec 19, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 15 Dec 2011, at 18:35, Dan Brickley wrote: >> Does log:semantics act as an owl:FunctionalProperty? i.e. within a >> single graph, can we expect at most one true property value for it? > > I don't think so. log:semantics depends on retrieval of a representation, and the result of that action may be different for different clients with different configuration, different network location, or different access credentials. > > Content negotiation by language is a nice example where the same client in the same network location and same access credentials would receive different representations, and hence different log:semantics, based on user configuration. ? IS it obvious that it would be different? The object of log:semantics is the RDF graph that the retrieved representation parses into, not the representation itself. Are there cases where content negotiation would give a different RDF graph from the same resource? (Genuine question, not rhetoric.) Pat > >> People seem to talk as if it is functional, but I can't see that >> working out in practice. > > Me neither. > > Best, > Richard > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 00:46:49 UTC