- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:56:24 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Kingsley,
That isn't legal SPARQL 1.1 Update syntax.
Specifically: INSERT INTO is SPARQL/Update submission syntax
but the WG decided on something different.
There's an (unofficial) validator at:
http://sparql.org/update-validator.html
which is running a parser derived from the same source as the spec grammar.
Andy
On 15/12/11 22:48, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> I embellished the data via following SPARQL.
>
> ## Web Semantics Ontology
>
> INSERT INTO <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.rdf>
> {?s rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> .
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#>
> <http://open.vocab.org/terms/defines> ?s .
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> a owl:Ontology .
> ?s <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.rdf>}
> FROM <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.rdf>
> WHERE {?s a ?o }
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 20:56:54 UTC