- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:09:17 -0500
- To: <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
+1 peter From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> Subject: Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 14 Dec Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:03:11 -0600 > On 13 Dec 2011, at 20:54, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> The main thing we seem to be in limbo about is the GRAPHS debate. I > suggest we devote the meeting to this theme. I have included in the > agenda some discussion topics that came up in recent telecons, plus the > email of Andy on TriG examples. I suggest we also have a > meta-discussion on what our options are for getting consensus. > > I suggest a straw poll: > > [[ > PROPOSAL: Close all graph model+semantics issues by accepting the RDF > Datasets design [1] as the data model, and by adding no new semantics. > ]] > > Knowing who can't live with this minimalist approach would be a form of > progress IMO. > > Best, > Richard > > > [1] > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-multigraph
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 22:10:31 UTC