- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:35:44 -0700
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
+1 empty lexical and value spaces should be permitted On 8/29/2011 11:15 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Andy, > > On 29 Aug 2011, at 18:04, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> The "non-empty lexical space" restriction seems to be artificial. >>> What's the reference for that restriction? AFAICT, an empty lexical space is consistent with RDF 2004 and XSD (1.0 and 1.1). >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#dtype_interp >> >> Point 1: >> >> [[ >> Formally, a datatype d is defined by three items: >> >> 1. a non-empty set of character strings called the lexical space of d; >> >> 2. a non-empty set called the value space of d; >> >> 3. a mapping from the lexical space of d to the value space of d, called the lexical-to-value mapping of d. >> >> The lexical-to-value mapping of a datatype d is written as L2V(d). >> ]] > Oh. Thanks, I hadn't seen this. > > I'd call it a buglet in RDF Semantics.
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 19:36:08 UTC