- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:46:59 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 29 Aug 2011, at 14:57, Andy Seaborne wrote: > The "non-empty lexical space" restriction seems to be artificial. What's the reference for that restriction? AFAICT, an empty lexical space is consistent with RDF 2004 and XSD (1.0 and 1.1). Best, Richard
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 15:47:33 UTC