W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: JSON Emergency Brake

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:30:47 -0400
Message-ID: <4E57BC27.7070602@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 8/26/11 6:35 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> As I said, using the Link HTTP header brings no advantage over embedding the link in the representation. The processing of rel="@context" is specific to JSON-LD anyways, so why not include the link in the JSON-LD payload.

Why not in both places as we do ? Then you let the developers choose. We 
already do this in the pages we serve up.

Just lookup a DBpedia URI to see what I mean, assuming you haven't done 
so already. Note, I don't mean rel="@context", I am  referring to 
mirroring "Link:" response headers with <link/> entries in <head/> of 
HTML resources.



Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen

Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 15:31:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:08 UTC