public-rdf-wg@w3.org from April 2011 by date

Friday, 29 April 2011

• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Nathan
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Ivan Herman
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Nathan
• Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: IRI guidance Ivan Herman
• Re: IRI guidance Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: IRI guidance Alex Hall
• Re: IRI guidance Ivan Herman
• Re: IRI guidance Alex Hall
• Re: IRI guidance Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: IRI guidance Ivan Herman
• Re: IRI guidance Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Michael Hausenblas
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Dan Brickley
• publication infrastructure / respec Sandro Hawke
• Re: IRI guidance Ivan Herman
• Re: IRI guidance Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: IRI guidance Ivan Herman
• Re: IRI guidance Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 28 April 2011

• Re: IRI guidance Nathan
• Re: IRI guidance Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: IRI guidance Alex Hall
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Andy Seaborne
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Dan Brickley
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon Andy Seaborne
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 27 April 2011

• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon David Wood
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-41 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument David Wood
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Dan Brickley
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• IRI guidance Nathan
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon Andy Seaborne
• RDF-ISSUE-41 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• RDF-ISSUE-40 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Contact with University of Southampton re: possible F2F Mischa Tuffield
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: proposal to hold a WG F2F at Bell Labs Ireland Andy Seaborne
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Additional terminology Andy Seaborne
• Re: Additional terminology Nathan

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Additional terminology Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Additional terminology Nathan
• Re: Additional terminology Richard Cyganiak
• [ALL] agenda 27 April telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: [ALL] minutes last week? Pat Hayes
• Re: [ALL] minutes last week? Ivan Herman
• [ALL] minutes last week? Guus Schreiber

Monday, 25 April 2011

• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 24 April 2011

• Re: typed literal equality Nathan
• Re: typed literal equality Pat Hayes
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Eric Prud'hommeaux
• typed literal equality Nathan
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Ivan Herman

Saturday, 23 April 2011

• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne

Friday, 22 April 2011

• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Nathan
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Andy Seaborne
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments William Waites
• Re: genid: Ivan Herman
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Nathan

Thursday, 21 April 2011

• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Pat Hayes
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Pat Hayes
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Nathan
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Nathan
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Andy Seaborne
• Re: Graphs, some quick comments Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Graphs, some quick comments Nathan
• Re: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update David Wood
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates William Waites
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Dan Brickley
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Dan Brickley
• Additional terminology Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Sandro Hawke
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Sandro Hawke
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes Alex Hall

Wednesday, 20 April 2011

• Re: ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) Alex Hall
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Nathan
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Nathan
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Nathan
• Re: ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: genid: Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: proposal to hold a WG F2F at Bell Labs Ireland Richard Cyganiak
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes Alex Hall
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes Alex Hall
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: genid: Steve Harris
• proposal to hold a WG F2F at Bell Labs Ireland Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: SPARQL update with blank nodes Alex Hall
• Editors of various Documents Mischa Tuffield
• SPARQL update with blank nodes Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: matching basic graph patterns Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• [ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update David Wood
• Re: matching basic graph patterns Andy Seaborne
• Re: matching basic graph patterns Alex Hall
• matching basic graph patterns Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: genid: William Waites
• [JSON] schema-based mapping of json into RDF Dan Brickley
• Re: genid: Steve Harris
• Re: genid: Sandro Hawke
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• skolem Sandro Hawke
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Richard Cyganiak
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Alex Hall
• Re: regrets & skolem predicates Ivan Herman
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• regrets & skolem predicates William Waites
• Re: 18. consequences. Richard Cyganiak
• Re: 18. consequences. Andy Seaborne
• Re: 18. consequences. Ivan Herman
• Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call Andy Seaborne
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposition to host 3rd F2F meeting at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France 23rd-24th of April 2012 David Wood
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics David Wood
• Re: 18. consequences. Andy Seaborne
• [ALL] Document Editors David Wood
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ACTION-28 Make sure issue-12 resolution gets to SPARQL David Wood
• Re: genid: Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call Richard Cyganiak
• Re: 18. consequences. Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call Andy Seaborne
• Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call Andy Seaborne
• On the IDN issues (on ISSUE-8) Ivan Herman
• Re: genid: Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 19 April 2011

• Re: genid: Steve Harris
• ACTION-28 Make sure issue-12 resolution gets to SPARQL Steve Harris
• 18. consequences. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon Steve Harris
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon Ivan Herman
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: genid: Dan Brickley
• Re: genid: Ivan Herman
• Re: genid: Andy Seaborne
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Nathan
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Mischa Tuffield
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon Ivan Herman
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Steve Harris
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document Steve Harris
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon Steve Harris
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Nathan
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document Nathan
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Nathan
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Steve Harris
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? William Waites
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document Nathan

Monday, 18 April 2011

• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document Nathan
• Problems with the RDF Semantics document (was: Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Richard Cyganiak
• [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon David Wood
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Nathan
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: [ALL] Poll dates/location 2nd FTF Guus Schreiber
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Andy Seaborne
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Nathan
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman

Sunday, 17 April 2011

• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Nathan
• Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Steve Harris
• Proposition to host 3rd F2F meeting at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France 23rd-24th of April 2012 Fabien Gandon
• remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Nathan
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Steve Harris
• rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12) Sandro Hawke
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Steve Harris
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Ivan Herman
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Dan Brickley
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes

Saturday, 16 April 2011

• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Dan Brickley
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] Antoine Zimmermann
• RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Steve Harris
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes

Friday, 15 April 2011

• RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• [ALL] blog post about F2F Guus Schreiber
• Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics Dan Brickley
• Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Dan Brickley
• Skolemization and RDF Semantics David Wood
• aside: "contexts" in RDF Dan Brickley
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Alex Hall
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list David Wood
• Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Richard Cyganiak
• RDF-ISSUE-37 (fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• F2F meeting minutes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [Graphs] Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Nathan
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Nathan
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Ivan Herman
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Pierre-Antoine Champin
• [ALL] Poll dates/location 2nd FTF Guus Schreiber
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Antoine Zimmermann
• [Graphs] Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman

Thursday, 14 April 2011

• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? Pat Hayes
• ISSUE-7: Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-36: Should we change the title of rdf-schema to use the word "Schema" ? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Steve Harris
• first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Dan Brickley
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• REST, g-box, g-text, g-snap Nathan
• Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Lee Feigenbaum
• ISSUE-35: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle Antoine Zimmermann

Wednesday, 13 April 2011

• Re: Regrets to the F2F Alex Hall
• turning JSON into RDF Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: presentation f2f about JSON Mischa Tuffield
• presentation f2f about JSON Matteo Brunati
• ISSUE-34: Do we need to add features to turtle, beyond what's in the Submission (such as inverse paths and =)? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-33: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples? William Waites
• ISSUE-33: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-32: Can we identify both g-boxes and g-snaps? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-31: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-29: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-28: Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3? RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f Thomas Steiner
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f Thomas Steiner
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Fwd: some feedback about the graph concept terminology Mischa Tuffield
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f Matteo Brunati
• Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

• Re: Practicalities for the f2f Thomas Steiner
• Re: Regrets to the F2F Axel Polleres
• Regrets to the F2F Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Sandro Hawke
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Steve Harris
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f Dan Brickley
• what is ericP's Turtle homework? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Practicalities for the f2f Thomas Steiner
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Pat Hayes

Monday, 11 April 2011

• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Deprecation of X Andy Seaborne
• [GRAPHS] Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Pat Hayes
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Steve Harris
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Deprecation of X Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Deprecation of X Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Pat Hayes
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Steve Harris
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Steve Harris
• Re: Deprecation of X Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Steve Harris
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Deprecation of X Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Richard Cyganiak
• Practicalities for the f2f Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Dan Brickley
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification) Sandro Hawke

Sunday, 10 April 2011

• Danbri's writeup regarding rdf:value (ISSUE-27) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Dan Brickley
• Re: OWL2 serialized as JSON? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: OWL2 serialized as JSON? Nathan
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Nathan
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Ivan Herman

Saturday, 9 April 2011

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] fensel
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] William Waites
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] William Waites
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] William Waites
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Ivan Herman

Friday, 8 April 2011

• Re: [JSON] A starting point... [fixed] Nathan
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Nathan
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Nathan
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Nathan
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Nathan
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Nathan
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Nathan
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Deprecation of X Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• Re: Deprecation of X Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• Re: Deprecation of X Dan Brickley
• Re: Deprecation of X Sandro Hawke
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Antoine Zimmermann
• Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Deprecation of X Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Deprecation of X Nathan
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Nathan
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Dan Brickley
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Richard Cyganiak
• A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Steve Harris
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Steve Harris
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Steve Harris
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Steve Harris
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] fensel
• Re: [JSON] user segments, version 2 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] Ivan Herman
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal -- rdf:Lists, property types Sandro Hawke
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• [JSON] user segments, version 2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Ivan Herman
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Manu Sporny
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 7 April 2011

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] David Wood
• RDF-ISSUE-27 (Deprecate rdf:value): Should we deprecate rdf:value? [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-26 (Deprecate rdf:ID on nodes): Should we deprecate rdf:ID on RDF/XML node elements? (use rdf:about instead) [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Pat Hayes
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Nathan
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Nathan
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Forgot a quote in my last email :-) fensel
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Nathan
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) fensel
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) William Waites
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) William Waites
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) William Waites
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) William Waites
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) William Waites
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) William Waites
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: owl:sameAs (Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)) William Waites
• Re: canonical definition of RDF? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Agenda ftf Guus Schreiber
• Re: canonical definition of RDF? Alex Hall
• Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Eric Prud'hommeaux
• canonical definition of RDF? Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Andy Seaborne
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Andy Seaborne
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Steve Harris
• Re: Agenda ftf David Wood
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• owl:sameAs (Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality David Wood
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Andy Seaborne
• [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: [Graph] Deprecation of reification Ivan Herman
• Re: [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality Lee Feigenbaum
• [Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality Alex Hall
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Manu Sporny
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Manu Sporny
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Manu Sporny
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal Manu Sporny
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 6 April 2011

• Re: Fwd: [Fwd: [Re: [RDF version of the W3C database.]]] Sandro Hawke
• Re: Triplestores and their supported RDF import formats, and RDF output via CONSTRUCT Mischa Tuffield
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Pat Hayes
• Re: Triplestores and their supported RDF import formats, and RDF output via CONSTRUCT Mischa Tuffield
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) William Waites
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Antoine Zimmermann
• "RDF Core Work Items" from the Workshop Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Pat Hayes
• [Graph] Deprecation of reification Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• RDF-ISSUE-23 (multigraph-media-types): Does going from single-graph to multi-graph require new format and new media types? [RDF Graphs] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) fensel
• Belated regrets... Polleres, Axel
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Antoine Zimmermann
• Triplestores and their supported RDF import formats, and RDF output via CONSTRUCT Mischa Tuffield
• Re: regrets from Nathan for today Thomas Steiner
• regrets from Nathan for today Sandro Hawke
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Steve Harris
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Steve Harris
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [JSON] A starting point... Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Pat Hayes
• [JSON] A starting point... Manu Sporny
• [JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 5 April 2011

• RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Nathan
• Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal Manu Sporny
• [ALL} Agenda 6 April telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: Definition of RDF Dataset Merge added to SPARQL query draft Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Definition of RDF Dataset Merge added to SPARQL query draft Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Thomas Steiner
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief William Waites
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief Nathan
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Thomas Steiner
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Thomas Steiner
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Thomas Steiner
• RDF-ISSUE-22 (EMPTY-GRAPHS): Does multigraph syntax need to support empty graphs? [RDF Graphs] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Steve Harris
• Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief William Waites
• [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20) Thomas Steiner
• IRI Whitespace? Nathan

Monday, 4 April 2011

• Agenda ftf Guus Schreiber
• Does Qurtle support empty graphs? Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? William Waites
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Sandro Hawke
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples William Waites
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 3 April 2011

• Re: [ALL] FTF presentations Matteo Brunati
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Sandro Hawke
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Steve Harris
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Steve Harris

Saturday, 2 April 2011

• Re: [JSON] RDF collections and JSON arrays Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Alex Hall
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Alex Hall
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Alex Hall
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] FTF presentations Thomas Steiner
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Steve Harris
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Steve Harris
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Steve Harris

Friday, 1 April 2011

• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Nathan
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Alex Hall
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Nathan
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Nathan
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Alex Hall
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-16 (Base JSON Grammar): What is the normative serialization of the JSON grammar? [RDF JSON] Nathan
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Nathan
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion David Wood
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion David Wood
• Re: [ALL] FTF presentations Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Nathan
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-21 (Shared Node-IDs): Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format? [RDF Graphs] David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? David Wood
• Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Sandro Hawke
• RDF-ISSUE-21 (Shared Node-IDs): Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format? [RDF Graphs] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? Sandro Hawke
• Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion Nathan
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Alex Hall
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? David Wood
• Re: Minutes? Gavin Carothers
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Minutes? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? Andy Seaborne
• Re: What *is* RDF? Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-18: How do we parse "18." in Turtle? Steve Harris

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2011 19:10:49 UTC