- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:17:18 +0100
- To: public-rdf-text@w3.org
Below are my review comments from November [1] to which I have not received a satisfactory response and/or that have not been implemented in the document. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2008OctDec/0006.html Criticism on the structure ==== - the sections 3.1 and 3.2 are not logically part of the definition of the data type, and so should not be included in section 3. Error in the document ==== - In the example in section 3.2 it is claimed that the string "Padre de familia" is mapped to the same value as the text "Padre de familia@". This is clearly not true.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 14:18:19 UTC