- From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:02:57 -0500
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Addison has answered the question for me :) - Thanks As to rationale, it was motivated by a comment from Martin Duerst on Unicode reference in OWL. Please see details at * http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC_Responses/MD1 Jie On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Phillips, Addison <addison@amazon.com> wrote: > Actually, Jie Bao's change is also dynamic (since it says "as updated from time to time by the publication of new versions"). What adding a specific version number does is establish a baseline---you mean "at least" 5.1.0. XML 1.0 5e did this too (as have other Specs). It's a good thing to do (since Unicode has steadily added things over time, this prevents someone from seizing on, say, version 3.0 and assuming you meant that). > > Addison Phillips > Globalization Architect -- Lab126 > Chair -- W3C Internationalization WG > > Internationalization is not a feature. > It is an architecture. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-rdf-text-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-text- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Axel Polleres >> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:13 AM >> To: Jie Bao >> Cc: public-rdf-text@w3.org; Boris Motik >> Subject: Re: Update Unicode reference for rdf:text >> >> >> Jie Bao wrote: >> > Hi Axel and Boris >> > >> > As I didn't hear objection from you, I would go ahead and make >> the >> > change to the wiki. Please let me know if you or others have >> comments. >> > >> > Jie >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu> wrote: >> >> Axel: >> >> >> >> It was suggested at the OWL meeting we update the Unicode >> reference >> >> for rdf:text with the following text. The main change is adding >> the >> >> mention of a specific Unicode version. >> >> >> >> "Unicode The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Standard, Version >> 5.1.0, >> >> ISBN 0-321-48091-0, as updated from time to time by the >> publication of >> >> new versions. (See >> http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions >> >> for the latest version and additional information on versions of >> the >> >> standard and of the Unicode Character Database)." >> >> >> >> Will you be ok with this change? >> >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec >> >> >> >> Jie >> >> hmmm, I have a question on that... e.g. on the lang-tags, we >> exlicitly >> refer to BPG-47 which is the "dynamic" link which always points to >> the >> latest version of the spec where here you seem to suggest just the >> opposite. >> >> In that sense, I'm not 100% sure. >> So, what is the ratonale of going to static version in one (unicode) >> and >> dynamic version in another case (lang tags)? >> >> Axel >> >> >> -- >> >> Jie >> >> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Axel Polleres >> Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of >> Ireland, >> Galway >> email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ > > -- Jie http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 17:03:36 UTC