- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:13:27 +0000
- To: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- CC: "public-rdf-text@w3.org" <public-rdf-text@w3.org>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Jie Bao wrote: > Hi Axel and Boris > > As I didn't hear objection from you, I would go ahead and make the > change to the wiki. Please let me know if you or others have comments. > > Jie > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu> wrote: >> Axel: >> >> It was suggested at the OWL meeting we update the Unicode reference >> for rdf:text with the following text. The main change is adding the >> mention of a specific Unicode version. >> >> "Unicode The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Standard, Version 5.1.0, >> ISBN 0-321-48091-0, as updated from time to time by the publication of >> new versions. (See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions >> for the latest version and additional information on versions of the >> standard and of the Unicode Character Database)." >> >> Will you be ok with this change? >> >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec >> >> Jie hmmm, I have a question on that... e.g. on the lang-tags, we exlicitly refer to BPG-47 which is the "dynamic" link which always points to the latest version of the spec where here you seem to suggest just the opposite. In that sense, I'm not 100% sure. So, what is the ratonale of going to static version in one (unicode) and dynamic version in another case (lang tags)? Axel >> -- >> Jie >> http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie >> > > > -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 16:14:09 UTC