Re: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#text ... not dereferenceable

Has this issue already been solved? For me, the url redirection idea
is ok. We will need a W3C stuff to set the url direction. It would be
easy if the server is Apache based. Is it allowed by W3C policy?

Jie

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org> wrote:
>
> We forgot some issue:
>
> The URL
>  http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#text
>
> is dereferenceable, but it obviously points to the
> RDF vocabulary spec instead of a URL descrbing our datatype.
>
> Is it possible, to redirect a fragment identifier URL to another address?
> Would that be feasible?
>
> Axel
>
> --
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
> Galway
> email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
>
>



-- 
Jie
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie

Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 18:15:24 UTC