- From: Rob McCool <robm@robm.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:29:50 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rdf-tap@w3.org
> I believe this should be rdf:about not rdf:ID. The latter gets expanded Yes, I thought I'd fixed that and was about to send a reply saying that I just hadn't updated that KB fragment in a while (we don't get much data on ear drops these days), but it turns out that the Perl code still had something in there to generate it. I fixed that but I haven't regenerated the KBs yet. Thanks. > Cool. I'd like to recommend TAP as one of the 'bulk' namespaces that > could be used inside FOAF files, eg. for describing weblog post topics, > personal interests, stuff being sold etc. Is > http://tap.stanford.edu/data/ the offial-est namespace URI you folks > are deploying? Should it be OK to encourage folk to write RDF using this > namespace and expect it to be dereference-able over the coming years...? Yes, we're sprinkling it everywhere and it's going to be very hard to remove, so you should consider it dereferencable for a long time. I haven't updated the SDK or the KB downloads in a while, partially because there hasn't been much interest, and partially because it takes effort. Is there interest now? I suppose if I just update them that may create some interest.
Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 15:29:53 UTC