- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:41:00 -0700
- To: "Rob McCool" <robm@robm.com>
- Cc: <public-rdf-tap@w3.org>, "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>
1. As I do more TAP examples, I see more examples
such as
FashionModelMacPherson,Elle
ActorMacPherson,Elle
which should be declared
FashionModelMacPherson,Elle owl:sameAs ActorMacPherson,Elle
So, the big question is: will TAP support such
*essential* OWL constructs, or will TAP stick
with just the RDF/RDFS constructs?
2. The MKR equivalent is
"FashionModelMacPherson,Elle" is "ActorMacPherson,Elle";
I *don't like the quotes* for MKR, but they are *required* to
distinguish a single resource from a list/set of two resources.
For example, I can say
"AthleteYounger,Jordan", "AthleteOlder,Jordan" is
"AthleteJordan,_Michael";
which indicates three names for the same resource.
3. Because of 2, I would like to see TAP do away with the
commas embedded in names.
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2003 15:44:19 UTC