- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:07:23 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
On 1/25/24 12:13, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > . . . > https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.html > (source: > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/blob/main/docs/seeking-consensus-2024-01.md) Fantastic summary! But I am surprised that I do not see any option to harmonize with named graphs. That seems like an obvious option to consider, since :e (in your examples) is merely a fourth component tacked onto the triple, and that's exactly what named graphs provide -- see NQuads. Were named graphs already considered for RDF-star implementation and rejected? If so, why? Please forgive me if this is a naive question from a distant observer. Thanks, David Booth
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2024 22:07:30 UTC