- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:18:25 +0200
- To: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
good morning;
> On 2021-09-17, at 12:27:10, Fabio Vitali <fabio.vitali@unibo.it> wrote:
>
> ...
>> (which impression agrees with his comprehension of the rdf-star deliberations, in general.)
>
> I am not sure if this is referring to me (that I do not understand rdf-star deliberations) or is a more general statement ("his" refers to "this reader", which in this context is you).
>
his = this reader
in general = in general
>> yes, absent a definition for dataset construction, there is no way to interpret the chronology example.
>> post-3.8, why does that matter?
>
> So let me clarify this: 3.8 suggests we use a ASK WHERE query to verify the truth value of a graph. Thus I add a boolean statement to the example, say:
more importantly and without regard to the specific consequences as to interpretation, 3.8 refers to a situation which demonstrates that, whichever question one asks, if one defines how to merge graphs, it is possible to answer ones questions.
which of 3.1 -- 3.7 one chooses is (modulo issues of completeness and correctness) immaterial.
sparlq chooses one.
best regards, from berlin,
Received on Saturday, 18 September 2021 06:18:40 UTC