- From: Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:15:53 +0200
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czosQ-2go6UXm90rdfva97r=ospx5=hOMHfkSad0QDMezg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, I am working in an industry with workflows integrating RDF and XML data. Having RDF/XML as a syntax is not important at all, it is rather problematic for the reasons mentioned in this thread. But having *one* simple, standardized XML syntax for RDF star would be very useful for the world I am living in - and many other industries, I assume. Also, no problem if the XML syntax is repetitive and verbose: XML guys are used to that :) - Felix On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 22:42, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 25/05/2021 15:08, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > > That looks like a TriX syntax, definitely not RDF/XML. > > https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/ > > > application/sparql-results+xml > > > https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/2021-04-13.html#sparql-star-query-results-xml-format > > Andy > > Apache Jena does support "TriX-star" > > https://jena.apache.org/documentation/io/trix.html#trix-star > > > > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:28 PM Joy lix <joylix4112@outlook.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, Olaf, Thank you for your swift response. > >> > >> I have noticed that in the latest Draft (Draft Community Group Report > 21 May 2021) there are the following expressions: > >> > >> > >> > >> EXAMPLE 20 > >> > >> Consider the following RDF term, an embedded triple in Turtle-star > syntax: > >> > >> << <http://example.org/alice> <http://example.org/name> "Alice" >> > >> > >> This term is represented in XML as follows: > >> > >> <triple> > >> > >> <subject> > >> > >> <uri>http://example.org/alice</uri> > >> > >> </subject> > >> > >> <predicate> > >> > >> <uri>http://example.org/name</uri> > >> > >> </predicate> > >> > >> <object> > >> > >> <literal datatype='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string > '>Alice</literal> > >> > >> </object> > >> > >> </triple> > >> > >> So, for << :John :meet :Sara >> :venue :HydePark . > >> > >> How can this RDF* be expressed in pure XML? Do I need to repeat the > triple structure again? > >> > >> > >> > >> Kind Regards, > >> > >> Joylix > >> > >> > >> > >> 发件人: Olaf Hartig > >> 发送时间: 2021年5月25日 21:14 > >> 收件人: Joy lix; public-rdf-star@w3.org > >> 主题: Re: rdf* to xml or rdf/xml > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Joylix, > >> > >> In our work so far, we have not extended the RDF/XML format for > RDF-star. > >> > >> Best, > >> Olaf > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Joy lix <joylix4112@outlook.com> > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 2:49 PM > >> To: public-rdf-star@w3.org > >> Subject: rdf* to xml or rdf/xml > >> > >> Hi, all, How can the following RDF* be expressed as XML or RDF/XML: > >> > >> @prefix : <http://www.example.org/> . > >> :HydePark :located :London . > >> << :John :meet :Sara >> :venue :HydePark ; > >> :date "2021-05-04". > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Joylix > >> > >> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2021 16:16:21 UTC