Re: It was all written!

My interpretation is that this could be shorthand for “all things RDF” (as in RDF, RDFS, etc.).

Ora


From: Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 6:10 AM
To: Ghislain ATEMEZING <ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com>
Cc: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] It was all written!
Resent-From: <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 6:09 AM


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.


it's kind of a typo! ... don't get all worked up about it :) like in the "star sceheme"

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:34 AM Ghislain ATEMEZING <ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com<mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Interesting! So what are we doing here if the standard was already their in 2009?

BTW, I still don’t see an explanation of that mention RDF* and the explanation of the 3rd rule. Maybe that explains also why this group exist today :)


Ghislain

Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any brevity or typing errors



Le 4 mai 2021 à 09:47, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca<mailto:info@csarven.ca>> a écrit :
On 04/05/2021 09.43, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:

Hi all,
I just discovered that, in his principles of Linked Data, back in 2009, Tim already recommended the use of RDF*!
  https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

:-D


https://twitter.com/csarven/status/1254394986860331008


-Sarven
https://csarven.ca/#i



--


---
Marco Neumann
KONA