Re: Does SHACL support rdf-star ?

On 07/07/2021 17:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We have an open discussion item for SHACL:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/122
>
> Adding a node kind is a natural step (with or without all the "or" 
> combinations).
>
> Another part needed is being about apply shapes on the components of a 
> quoted triple to say, for example, the object of the quoted triple is 
> a literal.
>
> Do you see any other requirements?

Not a requirement, but a nice to have: a common pattern in RDF-star is 
to use a triple both as asserted and embedded/quoted. Turtle-star 
provides syntactic sugar (called "annotation") for this:

     :alice :workingFor :acme {| :since "2013"^^xsd:gYear |}.

It would be nice to be able to constrain that pattern in an equally 
concise way in SHACL, something like:

    ex:PersonShape
        a sh:NodeShape ;
        sh:targetClass ex:Person ;
        sh:property [
            sh:path ex:workingFor ;
            sh:class ex:Company ;
            shx:annotation [
                sh:path ex:since ;
                sh:datatype xsd:gYear ;
            ]
        ] .

>
>     Andy
>
> On 07/07/2021 15:17, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>> Dear Joylix,
>>
>>
>> - standard SHACL does not support RDF-star (quite obviously, as 
>> RDF-star is not standard yet)
>>
>> - the RDF-star CG report does not propose any extension for the moment
>>
>> - I vaguely remember some people from Top Quadrant mentioning that 
>> they had a custom extension of SHACL for dealing with RDF-star, but I 
>> am not sure. Apart from that,, I am not aware of any implementation 
>> adding RDF-star support to SHACL.
>>
>>
>>    best
>>
>>
>> On 07/07/2021 14:52, Joy lix wrote:
>>> Hi, all.
>>> Can anyone tell me if SHACL currently supports RDF-STAR?
>>> Is there any simple example of this? Where can I validate the SHAPE 
>>> of RDF-STAR ?
>>> Thanks a lot !
>>>
>>> Joylix
>