Re: Agenda for 2021-01-15

There appears to be three changes in PR #75: a new section on triple
occurrences,  a new section on the seminal example, and the moving of the
original RDF* paper from an informative to a normative reference.  I find all
three of these changes problematic.

peter

On 1/15/21 2:39 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> sorry for this late  notice.
>
> Our next call will be again on
> https://classe-publique.univ-lyon1.fr/cha-2x1-tjt-iu3,
>
> at 4pm UTC:
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=RDF%2A+call&iso=20210115T16&p1=1440&ah=1
>
>
> and we will use W3C IRC server (http://irc.w3.org/) to minute the call,
> on channel #rdf-star
>
>
>
> I propose the following Agenda:
>
> * New people on the call introduce themselves
>
> * Review pending actions
>
>      -
> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction
>
> * Discuss the new sections on "triples vs occurrences" distinction
>   and how it may help resolve the issue about "unique triples" raised by Peter
>
>      - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/75 (the correct URL this time!)
>      - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/64
>
> * Discuss the new semantics proposal.
>   The goal here is not necessarily to go into too technical details
>   (judging from the discussions on the mailing list, only a few people have
> an interest in that)
>   but to discuss expected outcomes in terms of the related open issues
>
>      - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/81
>      - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/37 (syntactic sugar)
>      - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/22 (ref opacity)
>      - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/23 (mapping triples to URIs)
>
> * Keep 15 minutes for open-ended discussions
>
>
> Please have a look at the different pull requests (reminder: there is a
> "preview" link and a "diff" link on each of them).
>
>
> Best
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 15 January 2021 13:38:47 UTC