- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 17:15:28 +0100
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Hi there,
There on-going discussion of this and also the related results format
issues.
For example:
https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/43#issuecomment-765479971
<https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/43#issuecomment-765479971>
Migration is that hard part. In an enterprise setting, it might be
possible to coordinate software upgrades. On the web, it may take awhile
and there is a risk that servers using new MIME types out of caution
will cut off old applications.
Andy
On 02/04/2021 14:33, Quentin Reul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I was reviewing the latest draft [1], I was wondering whether the
> community had already come to an agreement on possible file extension
> and / or mime types for the RDF-star serializatiations (i.e.
> Turtle-star, N-Triples-star and N-Quad-star). For instance, the
> current file extension for Turtle is ".ttl" and the mime-type is
> "text/turtle" and I anticipate that applications will require to be
> able to distinguish between sets of triples expressed in traditional
> RDF compared to those expressed according to the RDF-star specification.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> [1] https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/2021-02-18.html
> <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/2021-02-18.html>
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2021 16:15:43 UTC