Hi there, There on-going discussion of this and also the related results format issues. For example: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/43#issuecomment-765479971 <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/43#issuecomment-765479971> Migration is that hard part. In an enterprise setting, it might be possible to coordinate software upgrades. On the web, it may take awhile and there is a risk that servers using new MIME types out of caution will cut off old applications. Andy On 02/04/2021 14:33, Quentin Reul wrote: > Hi all, > > As I was reviewing the latest draft [1], I was wondering whether the > community had already come to an agreement on possible file extension > and / or mime types for the RDF-star serializatiations (i.e. > Turtle-star, N-Triples-star and N-Quad-star). For instance, the > current file extension for Turtle is ".ttl" and the mime-type is > "text/turtle" and I anticipate that applications will require to be > able to distinguish between sets of triples expressed in traditional > RDF compared to those expressed according to the RDF-star specification. > > I look forward to hearing from you. > > Kind regards, > > [1] https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/2021-02-18.html > <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/2021-02-18.html>Received on Saturday, 3 April 2021 16:15:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 3 April 2021 16:15:44 UTC