- From: thomas lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:10:52 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>, "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
> On 4. Sep 2019, at 12:43, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > > > >> On 4 Sep 2019, at 11:21, thomas lörtsch <tl@rat.io> wrote: >> >> + is there a reason why the abstarct RDF* syntax with () braces is also part of this discussion? I’m mainly interested in the look and feel of RDF* in RDF. Consequently I’d like all examples to be in Turtle style if there is no good reason to resort to abstract syntax for e.g. comparison purposes. > > Let me assure you there is a good reason. > > Thank you, > Richard Let me assure you that before I go back and check if my request was really as dumb as your answer suggests your answer in any case is arrogant and not constructive and I see no reason for such snarkiness. I reserve the right to some dumbness from time to time as I know that at other times I do indeed have a point. I give others the same. How else could we have a productive discussion? Thomas
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2019 11:11:20 UTC