public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from January 2024 by date

Wednesday, 31 January 2024

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Re: the "semantic sugar" approach Pierre-Antoine Champin

Tuesday, 30 January 2024

• the "semantic sugar" approach Pierre-Antoine Champin
• summary of the Semantics TF discussion of last friday Pierre-Antoine Champin

Monday, 29 January 2024

• Re: Summary of the options on the table Olaf Hartig

Friday, 26 January 2024

• Re: Semantics TF call today? Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Semantics TF call today? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Semantics TF call today? Andy Seaborne
• Re: Atomic reification Andy Seaborne
• Semantics TF call today? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Summary of the options on the table Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Streaming Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: N-triple size Thomas Lörtsch
• N-triple size Andy Seaborne
• Re: Atomic reification Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Summary of the options on the table Thomas Lörtsch

Thursday, 25 January 2024

• Re: issues in rdf-test - new out-of-scope label Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: issues in rdf-test Andy Seaborne
• issues in rdf-test - new out-of-scope label Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Franconi Enrico
• Atomic reification Andy Seaborne
• Summary of the options on the table Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Streaming [was: Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity)] Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Andy Seaborne
• Regrets for today's meeting ddooss@wp.pl
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Niklas Lindström
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Olaf Hartig
• Regrets for today's meeting Antoine Zimmermann
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)

Wednesday, 24 January 2024

• Re: The rationale of well-formed-ness (Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal) Franconi Enrico
• The rationale of well-formed-ness (Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Franconi Enrico
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Adrian Gschwend

Tuesday, 23 January 2024

• AW: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Sasaki, Felix
• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Andy Seaborne
• Re: Anecdote/implemention note Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Andy Seaborne
• Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal Franconi Enrico
• Re: [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Doerthe Arndt
• [IMPORTANT] Necessary revision of the sugar proposal Franconi Enrico
• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Anecdote/implemention note Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
• Re: Other comments to the sugar proposal Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Doerthe Arndt
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Franconi Enrico
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Doerthe Arndt
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Franconi Enrico
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Franconi Enrico
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Franconi Enrico

Monday, 22 January 2024

• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Other comments to the sugar proposal Franconi Enrico
• Re: Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Franconi Enrico
• Against the notion of reification well-formed graph (i.e., atomicity) Franconi Enrico

Sunday, 21 January 2024

• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Sasaki, Felix

Saturday, 20 January 2024

• Re: Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Andy Seaborne

Friday, 19 January 2024

• syntactic sugar proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Triple-terms only as object of rdf:nameOf triples? Souripriya Das

Thursday, 18 January 2024

• N-Triple should stay as a line-based subset of Turtle Souripriya Das
• Re: Seeking consensus on RDF-star Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [External] : Seeking consensus on RDF-star Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: [External] : Seeking consensus on RDF-star Niklas Lindström
• Re: [External] : Seeking consensus on RDF-star Souripriya Das
• Adjusting the suggested RDF-star naming notation Niklas Lindström

Wednesday, 17 January 2024

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Seeking consensus on RDF-star Adrian Gschwend

Tuesday, 16 January 2024

• A focus on reification Niklas Lindström
• Re: SPARQL DESCRIBE Olaf Hartig

Monday, 15 January 2024

• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Pierre-Antoine Champin

Friday, 12 January 2024

• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Olaf Hartig
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: miniCore Re: MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: miniCore Re: MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go Andy Seaborne
• miniCore Re: MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go Thomas Lörtsch
• MiniMax proposal - my take on where we are and where we should go Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Olaf Hartig
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: A proposed methodology for seeking consensus Niklas Lindström
• Re: A proposed methodology for seeking consensus Adrian Gschwend
• A proposed methodology for seeking consensus Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Pierre-Antoine Champin

Thursday, 11 January 2024

• Event Updated: RDF-star Triple-Edge subgroup meeting Enrico Franconi (W3C Calendar)
• Event Updated: RDF-star Triple-Edge subgroup meeting Pierre-Antoine Champin (W3C Calendar)
• Re: Selective Transparency of Claims Thomas Lörtsch
• Regrets Lassila, Ora
• Re: Selective Transparency of Claims Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Terminology definitions ; motivating example Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version Andy Seaborne
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Niklas Lindström
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Olaf Hartig
• Re: Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Niklas Lindström
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version Andy Seaborne
• Re: graph terms vs nested triples Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version Olaf Hartig
• Representing Named Triples as Just Triples Niklas Lindström

Wednesday, 10 January 2024

• Consolidating triple/edges -- occurrence set version Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL DESCRIBE John Walker

Tuesday, 9 January 2024

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Selective Transparency of Claims Niklas Lindström

Monday, 8 January 2024

• Re: Terminology definitions ; motivating example Andy Seaborne

Sunday, 7 January 2024

• Re: Terminology definitions ; motivating example Niklas Lindström
• Terminology definitions ; motivating example Andy Seaborne
• Re: Occurrences as Named Triples Thomas Lörtsch

Saturday, 6 January 2024

• Occurrences as Named Triples Niklas Lindström

Friday, 5 January 2024

• Re: Special subgroup meeting Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Andy Seaborne
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Olaf Hartig
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Olaf Hartig
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Niklas Lindström
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Niklas Lindström
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Olaf Hartig
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Olaf Hartig
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Andy Seaborne
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Niklas Lindström
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico

Thursday, 4 January 2024

• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFn Souripriya Das
• Re: RDFn Olaf Hartig
• Special subgroup meeting Lassila, Ora
• RDFn Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Franconi Enrico
• Re: [External] : Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting Souripriya Das

Wednesday, 3 January 2024

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting Adrian Gschwend
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)

Tuesday, 2 January 2024

• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Andy Seaborne
• Re: Annotations associated only with occurrences? Andy Seaborne

Monday, 1 January 2024

• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Gregg Kellogg
• RDFn (simplified): Set of Triples and Set of Edges Souripriya Das
• Re: Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Andy Seaborne
• Consolidating triple/edges -- named occurrence version Andy Seaborne

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 12:30:54 UTC