- From: Håvard Ottestad <hmottestad@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:06:50 +0200
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
“Shapes validation would be great!” - someone who has written many wrong shapes. Håvard > On 17 Jun 2019, at 16:45, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > > Dear all, > > The Solid ecosystem (https://solid.inrupt.com/) > is a way of building decentralized Linked Data apps, > where people store their data in their own data pod > and can interact with it using different apps. > > To realize this kind of interoperability, > we will likely heavily rely on shapes, > extended with forms (UIs for people) > and footprints (rules on where to store data). > > We’ve written down some of our thinking > in a Design Issue (status: draft) at > https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Footprints.html > and I have written the longer story, > including thoughts about future use cases, at > https://ruben.verborgh.org/blog/2019/06/17/shaping-linked-data-apps/ > > Your feedback as shape experts is very welcome. > I’m particularly interested in related technologies and use cases > that we might have missed when writing this down. > > Best, > > Ruben
Received on Monday, 17 June 2019 15:47:20 UTC