- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 07:02:52 -0400
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
I'm considering the feasibility of compiling ShEx to SHACL. Is there a
shorter way to compile this ShEx oneOf:
<NameShape> {
foaf:name LITERAL
| foaf:givenName LITERAL ; foaf:familyName LITERAL
}
than this SHACL?:
:UserShape
sh:or (
[ sh:and (
[ sh:property
[ sh:path foaf:name; sh:minCount 1; sh:maxCount 1 ] ]
[ sh:not [
sh:property
[ sh:path foaf:givenName; sh:minCount 1; sh:maxCount 1 ] ] ]
[ sh:not [
sh:property
[ sh:path foaf:familyName; sh:minCount 1; sh:maxCount 1 ] ] ] ) ]
[ sh:and (
[ sh:not [ sh:property
[ sh:path foaf:name; sh:minCount 1; sh:maxCount 1 ] ] ]
[ sh:property
[ sh:path foaf:givenName; sh:minCount 1; sh:maxCount 1 ] ]
[ sh:property
[ sh:path foaf:familyName; sh:minCount 1; sh:maxCount 1 ] ] ) ] ) .
--
-ericP
office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Monday, 5 June 2017 11:02:59 UTC