- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:12:31 -0800
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
I see that there is a modified section on pre-binding in the SHACL document. There are multiple structural problems with this section. There is no demonstration that the choice of fresh variables in the definition of PrjMap(P,PV) is insignificant. The result of PrjMap(X) depends on the order in which the projections in X are chosen, but this order is not specified. The statement of pre-binding in the SHACL document doesn't mention pre-binding at all, just evaluation. Pre-binding is defined in the SHACL document on solution mappings and graph patterns. However, all the places where pre-binding is used in SHACL are for a solution mapping and a query. In SPARQL, queries are not graph patterns so the definition of pre-binding in the SHACL document is not applicable. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 03:13:35 UTC