W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > January 2017

Comments and questions on SHACL

From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:19:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPugn7VDnGF4jdv-wwVaZHHNjg220Di5RJCT2D2hc7Dy1pgVfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org

   - In the example shapes graph at
   "sh:nodeKind ex:IRI ;" should be "sh:nodeKind sh:IRI ;"
   - In https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#nonValidation, I would
   find it useful to be able to express sh:order also on Shapes and not only
   PropertyConstraints, in order to display an ordered list of Shapes;
   - I have a doubt about the best way to express the equivalent of a
   "domain" contraint in SHACL, that is : "given a property :p, I want to make
   sure that all X that are subjects of :p have class C". Given that I have
   defined one Shape per Class in my ontology, can I express this without
   redefining an extra shape and keeping only one Shape per class ?



*Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA*
Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux
blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin :
tel :  +33 (0), skype : francartthomas
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 14:21:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC