- From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:19:47 +0100
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPugn7VDnGF4jdv-wwVaZHHNjg220Di5RJCT2D2hc7Dy1pgVfg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello - In the example shapes graph at https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#NodeKindConstraintComponent, "sh:nodeKind ex:IRI ;" should be "sh:nodeKind sh:IRI ;" - In https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#nonValidation, I would find it useful to be able to express sh:order also on Shapes and not only PropertyConstraints, in order to display an ordered list of Shapes; - I have a doubt about the best way to express the equivalent of a "domain" contraint in SHACL, that is : "given a property :p, I want to make sure that all X that are subjects of :p have class C". Given that I have defined one Shape per Class in my ontology, can I express this without redefining an extra shape and keeping only one Shape per class ? Cheers Thomas -- *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux *connaissances* blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 14:21:30 UTC