public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from February 2017 by date

Tuesday, 28 February 2017

• Re: on value Holger Knublauch

Monday, 27 February 2017

• Re: limiting ill-formed nodes in SHACL Irene Polikoff
• Re: on value Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: limiting ill-formed nodes in SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Holger Knublauch
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch
• Re: on value Holger Knublauch
• Re: Comments on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C Editor's Draft 22 February 2017 Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 26 February 2017

• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Holger Knublauch
• limiting ill-formed nodes in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• on value Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SHACL for OWL2 Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 25 February 2017

• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Irene Polikoff
• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Formal objection to removing features from node shapes Irene Polikoff
• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Irene Polikoff
• Re: Comments on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C Editor's Draft 22 February 2017 Irene Polikoff
• Comments on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C Editor's Draft 22 February 2017 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Formal objection to removing features from node shapes Irene Polikoff
• Formal objection to removing features from node shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 24 February 2017

• Re: SHACL for OWL2 Simon Steyskal
• Re: SHACL for OWL2 Stephane Fellah
• Re: status of SHACL-SPARQL Holger Knublauch
• Re: SHACL for OWL2 Simon Spero

Thursday, 23 February 2017

• Re: on compliance testing for SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: SHACL for OWL2 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Formal objection on syntax checking in SHACL Irene Polikoff
• Re: SHACL for OWL2 Simon Spero
• Re: SHACL for OWL2 Stephane Fellah
• SHACL for OWL2 Stephane Fellah
• on compliance testing for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: target and property shape Holger Knublauch
• [ANN] Released JOPA 0.9.2 - Efficient Open-source Java Library to edit RDF/OWL Ontologies Petr Křemen
• status of SHACL-SPARQL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Formal objection on syntax checking in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Holger Knublauch
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• notice of non-implementation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 22 February 2017

• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Holger Knublauch
• target and property shape Olivier Corby
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch
• Re: Review of SHACL document (2) Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 21 February 2017

• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review of SHACL document (2) Olivier Corby
• RE: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Svensson, Lars
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch
• Re: Review of SHACL document (2) Holger Knublauch
• Re: handling recursive shapes in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: handling recursive shapes in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: handling recursive shapes in SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Holger Knublauch
• Re: syntax checking for SHACL Holger Knublauch

Monday, 20 February 2017

• handling recursive shapes in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• syntax checking for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Review of SHACL document (2) Olivier Corby
• RE: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Svensson, Lars
• RE: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Svensson, Lars
• RE: Comment on Entailment Regimes Svensson, Lars
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Irene Polikoff

Sunday, 19 February 2017

• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Holger Knublauch
• Re: Comment on Entailment Regimes Holger Knublauch
• SHACL syntax in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 17 February 2017

• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Svensson, Lars
• RE: Minor typos in SHACL spec Svensson, Lars
• RE: Comment on Entailment Regimes Svensson, Lars
• Re: Comment on Entailment Regimes Holger Knublauch
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Irene Polikoff
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Holger Knublauch
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 16 February 2017

• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Holger Knublauch
• Re: Minor typos in SHACL spec Holger Knublauch
• Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Svensson, Lars
• Minor typos in SHACL spec Svensson, Lars
• Comment on Entailment Regimes Svensson, Lars
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Holger Knublauch
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: information lacking for closed issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: on sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: wrong name for exactly one Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

• Re: on sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Holger Knublauch
• Re: information lacking for closed issues Holger Knublauch
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Holger Knublauch
• Re: wrong name for exactly one Holger Knublauch
• on sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

• wrong name for exactly one Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 13 February 2017

• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch

Friday, 10 February 2017

• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 9 February 2017

• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch
• Re: Typo in nodeKind Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 (shapes portion) Irene Polikoff
• Re: information lacking for closed issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: information lacking for closed issues Irene Polikoff
• information lacking for closed issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 (shapes portion) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: strange different wording for what is probably the same thing Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• SHACL Core validator Olivier Corby
• Typo in nodeKind Olivier Corby
• Re: behaviour of ASK-based validators Holger Knublauch
• Re: SHACL draft ready for review Holger Knublauch
• Re: strange different wording for what is probably the same thing Holger Knublauch
• Re: missing normative reference in SHACL document Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• missing normative reference in SHACL document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed test case for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Re: proposed test case for SHACL Holger Knublauch
• Re: editorial problem in example in 6.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: editorial problem in example in 6.1 Holger Knublauch
• loss of functionality Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SHACL draft ready for review Holger Knublauch
• proposed test case for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 8 February 2017

• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• alternative definition of SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• behaviour of ASK-based validators Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• strange different wording for what is probably the same thing Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: $this in Aggregations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial Holger Knublauch
• Re: $this in Aggregations Irene Polikoff
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: editorial problem in example in 6.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: $this in Aggregations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Olivier Corby
• Re: qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Holger Knublauch
• qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Olivier Corby
• Re: SHACL draft ready for review Olivier Corby
• Re: SHACL draft ready for review Olivier Corby
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Holger Knublauch
• Re: $this in Aggregations Holger Knublauch
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Re: editorial problem in example in 6.1 Holger Knublauch
• Re: editorial problem in example in 6.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: editorial problem in example in 6.1 Holger Knublauch
• editorial problem in example in 6.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SHACL draft ready for review Holger Knublauch
• Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial Holger Knublauch
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Holger Knublauch
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 7 February 2017

• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Union operations on graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: SHACL draft ready for review Olivier Corby
• Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 Holger Knublauch
• probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 6 February 2017

• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff

Sunday, 5 February 2017

• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff

Saturday, 4 February 2017

• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Irene Polikoff
• Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 2 February 2017

• New SHACL Working Draft 2017-02-02 Holger Knublauch

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2017 00:17:54 UTC